Skip to main content

Press regulation ~ Further inquiry?

Remember the Leveson Inquiry?  Its website was archived in 2014 - HERE.   The 4 Volume Report (29th November 2012) is HERE.

Eseentially, the Leveson Report recommended a system of self-regulation for the press underpinned by legislation.

The outcome of the events that followed was the creation - by Royal Charter - of the Press Recognition Panel (PRP) and the enactment of some sections in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 - notably section 40. Section 40 has not been brought into force.



In March 2018 it was announced that the government had decided not to reconvene the Leveson Inquiry even though a second stage had been envisaged to examine relationships between journalists and the Police.  - The Guardian 1st March.  The Conservative Party Manifesto - published for the 2017 general election - stated that the second part of the Leveson Inquiry would not take place and also that section 40 would be repealed - BBC 18th May 2017.

Earlier this month, the House of Commons voted (304 to 295) against holding a further inquiry - BBC 9th May.  The vote took place in the context of the Data Protection Bill 2017-19  which commenced its parliamentary progress in the Lords.  The actual clause voted on may be seen at Hansard Online 9th May.  The proposed investigation would have a much broader scope than Leveson and would include topics such as fake news and the misuse of data by social media companies, potentially causing headaches for the likes of Twitter and Facebook.

The Bill returned to the Lords and , on 14th May, the House voted (252 to 213) to reverse the Commons vote - see the Debate 14th May.

In moving the successful amendment in the Lords, crossbench peer Baroness Hollins said - "Holding an inquiry will not restrict freedom; rather, it will support it by shining a spotlight on what has been done illegally and unethically to the detriment of hundreds of ordinary people, including my daughter and my family before I became a Member of your Lordships’ House. As explained by my noble friend Lord Kerslake regarding his findings after the Manchester Arena bombing, there is no evidence that enough lessons have been learned by all sections of the media or that there is adequate accountability. I do not consider that the review by the Information Commissioner is in any way a substitute for completing the inquiry. The job has not been done, and with respect to IPSO, I believe I am right in saying that so far only around 12 of more than 90 of Sir Brian Leveson’s recommendations have been implemented. In formally moving my amendment, I wish to test the opinion of the House."

Against this view, the News Media Association comments that - "Legislation aimed at making our data protection laws fit for the digital age must not be used to enforce state-backed press regulation and obstruct investigative journalism.  Setting up a costly and unnecessary, taxpayer-funded public inquiry into the whole media industry and introducing another punitive version of Section 40 costs sanctions against newspapers and magazines, would inflict huge damage on a free press" - see  The Threat to Press Freedom

On 15th May, the matter returned for a further vote in the House of Commons.  The Commons voted 301 to 289 to disagree with the Lords amendment to the Data Protection Bill relating to personal data for the purposes of journalism.  Read the amendment (62B).

A useful summary of the situation regarding press regulation is Research Briefing 07576 - Press Regulation after Leveson - unfinished businesss?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fastest Way To Lose Weight For Women

Have you been looking for the fastest way to shed pounds for girls however have come up empty handed? Is there a reason why girls have exclusive questions and issues than guys with regard to health? There is a lot incorrect information and contradictions in the health enterprise that it is able to make your head spin. We are going to address the ones very problems and get proper to the point. You want to lose weight the healthy way and also you want it fast. Let's jump proper in! 1)Fasting 1-2 times every week Don't fear approximately "ravenous" yourself or wondering if your frame will cross into "hunger mode." This is one in all the biggest myths of the diet and health industry. Fasting for a 24 hour period 1-2 instances per week is a completely healthful and useful way to lose fats. Fasting offers the digestive machine a break whilst creating a big caloric deficit this is needed to lose the extra pounds. Fasting has also been related to assuaging health tr...

How Do You Get Lean? Start Eating Functionally

 Now, I like most of the people enjoy a chunk of ingesting out, specially breakfasts and even takeaways now and then and these ingredients can be included into your upkeep diet in moderation depending to your interest degree and fitness situation, however on the subject of achieving your goal within the first area a disciplined strategy is required. The manner to consume to get lean is knowing the GI/GL cost of the ingredients you eat and the way those impact the glycogen stores in your muscle groups and liver, to get lean you want to lower those shops so that you can enter the fat burning sector. So going into this you want to have your desires clean, you are trying to lose body fat, you want to be leaner and it's going to take discipline and effort, human beings that strive to tell you in any other case are possibly looking to kid you into shopping for their merchandise or some thing on the premise that it's the clean way. Now it's handiest human nature to are seeking ...

Tips For Women Trying to Lose Body Fat

  Most dieters understand the physical venture of seeking to shed pounds, however many dieters forget the psychological struggles ahead. Below are  guidelines for women trying to lose body fat. Don't Live By The Scale When beginning a new diet you need to put yourself for fulfillment, no longer failure. One way to improve your motivation and keep losing body fats is to area less emphasis on a weight scale. It's not unusual for dieters who've exercised continuously and feel great to lose motivation when they step on a scale. Losing frame fat, and dropping body weight are not the same aim. It's possible to lessen your body fat and advantage new muscle without dropping a unmarried pound of frame weight, due to the fact the moves offset one another. A fantastic action may be perceived as negative when that happens. You have much less body fat with greater muscle definition, however you view the development in a bad light due to the fact your frame weight is the same....